The Supreme Court Sidesteps the Voting Act

June 23rd, 2009 by Leeds Morelli & Brown

The Supreme Court ruled on a challenge to the landmark Voting Rights Act but sidestepped the issue of whether Section 5 of the act is unconstitutional. Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act freezes election practices or procedures in certain states until the new procedures have been subjected to review, either after an administrative review by the United States Attorney General, or after a lawsuit before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

The Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District in Austin, Texas can now apply to opt out of the advanced approval requirement. The case was initiated because the District wanted to be able to opt out of the entire provision or have the entire provision declared unconstitutional. Chief Justice John Roberts openly admitted the court did not want to decide on the issue of constitutionality.

As an anti discrimination law the Voting Rights Act is a sensitive issue to most thus any revisions are guaranteed to be controversial and has the potential to affect millions of black voters.

For two decades, Leeds, Morelli and Brown, PC has championed the fight against discrimination. If you or someone you know has been a victim of discrimination contact Leeds, Morelli and Brown, PC at 1-800-545-4658 for a free consultation.

Posted in Discrimination, Human Interest |

Comments are closed.